«Don’t use ChatGPT for research»
El consejo de este señor es no usar ChatGPT para la investigación, por problemas de derecho de copia y de alucinación. Aconseja usar
- Consensus para la pregunta de investigación – preguntándole si hay consenso
- Scispace / preguntando por limitaciones
- Avidnote / para encontrar sugerencias de investigación
- Consensus para buscar fuentes
- Scispace para escribir
- Jenni.ai para escribir
Además, recomendaría
- Jungle AI para asegurarse de haber entendido bien el texto leído
- Notebook LM para hacer preguntas a (colecciones o subcolecciones de) textos
EN
The speaker’s advice is not to use ChatGPT because of the copyright problems and the risk of hallucination. He prefers us to use
- Consensus for research question / ask if there is consensus ?
- Scispace / ask or look for limitations
- Avidnote / recent systematic review > look for research suggestions
- Consensus for sources
- Scispace for writing
- Jenni.ai for writing
In addition, I’d like to recommend
- Jungle AI to make sure you understood the text you’ve read
- Notebook LM for asking questions to texts
In other sources I also see references to
- Connected Papers | Find and explore academic papers
- Elicit: The AI Research Assistant
- Semantic Scholar | AI-Powered Research Tool
- Sourcely | Find Academic Sources with AI
- Scispace: AI Research Assistant with Agentic Approach
- Scite: AI for Research
- Research Rabbit
- R Discovery: AI Academic Research Reading App: AI Literature Search Tool; 250 M+ Research Papers